Back to activitiesAcademic

Research at Naresuan University compares the value of 2 types of nasal sprays for allergies.

This content was machine-translated from Thai and may contain inaccuracies.

Event date 10/26/2026

View original post
Research at Naresuan University compares the value of 2 types of nasal sprays for allergies.

A study on Health Economic Evaluation from Naresuan University published in Pharmacy Practice 2026 examines the health economics of two nasal sprays, Intranasal Olopatadine (INOP) and

A Health Economic Evaluation study from Naresuan University published in Pharmacy Practice 2026 examined the health economics value of two nasal sprays, Intranasal Olopatadine (INOP) and Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray (FFNS), for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, using 52 patient data in combination with a 1-year health economics model, found that Olopatadine averaged a cost of THB 10,271.90 per year, giving a result of 0.74 QALYs, while Fluticasone Furoate averaged a cost of 9,330.08.THB per year yields 0.83 QALYs under the base-case model, so the Olopatadine approach is dominated at a higher cost, but the results are lower. However, the authors emphasize that it should be interpreted cautiously because the sample and severity of the disease in each group of patients are different. The authors include Chanida Chantim, Prayuth Poowaruttanawiwit, and Rattharada Suriyapak, affiliated with Naresuan University, Thailand, published in the journal Pharmacy Practice. 2026; 24 (4): 3800.
# Health Economics # HealthEconomics # Pharmacoeconomics # AllergicRhinitis # NaresuanUniversity
View original post on Facebook
View original postBack to activities